FANDOM


This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).

Template:Pp-vandalism

This article is primarily about the sexual interest in prepubescent children. For the act itself, see Child sexual abuse. For the primary sexual interest in 11–14 year old pubescents, see Hebephilia. For mid-to-late adolescents (15-19), see Ephebophilia.
Pedophilia
Classification and external resources
ICD-10 F65.4
ICD-9 302.2
MeSH D010378

As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia (or paedophilia) is typically defined as a psychiatric disorder in adults or late adolescents (persons age 16 and older) characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children (generally age 13 years or younger, though onset of puberty may vary). The child must be at least five years younger in the case of adolescent pedophiles.[1][2][3][4] The word pedophilia comes from the Template:Lang-el (paîs), meaning "child," and φιλία (philía), "friendly love" or "friendship", though this literal meaning is considered inappropriate in modern times.[5] The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) defines pedophilia as a "disorder of adult personality and behaviour" in which there is a sexual preference for children of prepubertal or early pubertal age.[6] The term has a range of definitions as found in psychiatry, psychology, the vernacular, and law enforcement.

According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), pedophilia is a paraphilia in which a person has intense and recurrent sexual urges towards and fantasies about prepubescent children and on which feelings they have either acted or which cause distress or interpersonal difficulty.[1] The current DSM-5 draft proposes to add hebephilia to the diagnostic criteria, and consequently to rename it to pedohebephilic disorder.[7] Although most pedophiles are men, there are also women who exhibit the disorder,[8][9] and researchers assume available estimates underrepresent the true number of female pedophiles.[10] No cure for pedophilia has been developed. There are, however, certain therapies that can reduce the incidence of a person committing child sexual abuse.[11][12] In the United States, following Kansas v. Hendricks, sex offenders that are diagnosed with certain mental disorders, particularly pedophilia, can be subject to indefinite civil commitment,[13] under various state laws (generically called SVP laws[14][15][16]) and the federal Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006.[17]

In common usage, pedophilia means any sexual interest in children or the act of child sexual abuse, often termed "pedophilic behavior".[2][11][18][19] For example, The American Heritage Stedman's Medical Dictionary states, "Pedophilia is the act or fantasy on the part of an adult of engaging in sexual activity with a child or children."[20] This common use application also extends to the sexual interest and abuse of pubescent or post-pubescent minors.[21][22] Researchers recommend that these imprecise uses be avoided,[21] as people who commit child sexual abuse commonly exhibit the disorder,[11][23][24] but some offenders do not meet the clinical diagnosis standards for pedophilia, and the clinical diagnosis standards pertain to prepubescents. Additionally, not all pedophiles actually commit such abuse.[25][26][27]

Pedophilia was first formally recognized and named in the late 19th century. A significant amount of research in the area has taken place since the 1980s. At present, the exact causes of pedophilia have not been conclusively established.[28] Research suggests that pedophilia may be correlated with several different neurological abnormalities, and often co-exists with other personality disorders and psychological pathologies. In the contexts of forensic psychology and law enforcement, a variety of typologies have been suggested to categorize pedophiles according to behavior and motivations.[22]

Etymology and definitions Edit

The word comes from the Template:Lang-el (paidophilía): Template:Lang-el (paîs), "child" and Template:Lang-el (philía), "friendly love" or "friendship". [29] Paidophilia was coined by Greek poets either as a substitute for "paiderastia" (pederasty).Template:Cn

Nepiophilia, also called infantophilia, is not necessarily the same thing as pedophilia, and is used to refer to a sexual preference for toddlers and infants (usually ages 0–3).[30][original research?]

Pedophilia is used for individuals with a primary sexual interest in children age 13 and younger.[1]

Hebephilia is used for individuals with a primary sexual interest in 11-14 year old pubescents.[31] The DSM IV does not list hebephilia among the diagnoses, while the ICD-10 includes hebephilia in its pedophilia definition.[3]

Disease modelsEdit

The term paedophilia erotica was coined in 1886 by the Viennese psychiatrist Richard von Krafft-Ebing in his writing Psychopathia Sexualis.[32] The term appears in a section titled "Violation of Individuals Under the Age of Fourteen," which focuses on the forensic psychiatry aspect of child sexual offenders in general. Krafft-Ebing describes several typologies of offender, dividing them into psychopathological and non-psychopathological origins, and hypothesizes several apparent causal factors that may lead to the sexual abuse of children.[32]

Krafft-Ebing mentioned paedophilia erotica in a typology of "psycho-sexual perversion." He wrote that he had only encountered it four times in his career and gave brief descriptions of each case, listing three common traits:

  1. The individual is tainted [by heredity] (hereditär belastate)[33]
  2. The subject's primary attraction is to children, rather than adults.
  3. The acts committed by the subject are typically not intercourse, but rather involve inappropriate touching or manipulating the child into performing an act on the subject.

He mentions several cases of pedophilia among adult women (provided by another physician), and also considered the abuse of boys by homosexual men to be extremely rare.[32] Further clarifying this point, he indicated that cases of adult men who have some medical or neurological disorder and abuse a male child are not true pedophilia, and that in his observation victims of such men tended to be older and pubescent. He also lists "Pseudopaedophilia" as a related condition wherein "individuals who have lost libido for the adult through masturbation and subsequently turn to children for the gratification of their sexual appetite" and claimed this is much more common.[32]

In 1908, Swiss neuroanatomist and psychiatrist Auguste Forel wrote of the phenomenon, proposing that it be referred to it as "Pederosis," the "Sexual Appetite for Children." Similar to Krafft-Ebing's work, Forel made the distinction between incidental sexual abuse by person's with dementia and other organic brain conditions, and the truly preferential and sometimes exclusive sexual desire for children. However, he disagreed with Krafft-Ebing in that he felt the condition of the latter was largely ingrained and unchangeable.[34]

The term "Pedophilia" became the generally accepted term for the condition and saw widespread adoption in the early 20th century, appearing in many popular medical dictionaries such as the 5th Edition of Stedman's. In 1952, it was included in the first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.[35] This edition and the subsequent DSM-II listed the disorder as one subtype of the classification "Sexual Deviation," but no diagnostic criteria were provided. The DSM-III, published in 1980, contained a full description of the disorder and provided a set of guidelines for diagnosis.[36] The revision in 1987, the DSM-III-R, kept the description largely the same, but updated and expanded the diagnostic criteria.[37] Some clinicians have proposed further cateogories, somewhat or completely distinguished from pedophilia, including "pedohebephilia," "hebephilia," and "ephebophilia" (though ephebophilia is not considered pathological).[38][39] Other experts such as Karen Franklin consider classifications like hebephilia to be "pretextual" diagnoses which should not be considered disorders.[40]

Diagnostic criteriaEdit

ICD-10 and DSMEdit

The ICD-10 defines pedophilia as "a sexual preference for children, boys or girls or both, usually of prepubertal or early pubertal age."[6] Under this system's criteria, a person 16 years of age or older meets the definition if they have a persistent or predominant sexual preference for prepubescent children at least five years younger than them.[6]

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) outlines specific criteria for use in the diagnosis of this disorder. These include the presence of sexually arousing fantasies, behaviors or urges that involve some kind of sexual activity with a prepubescent child (age 13 or younger, though puberty may vary) for six months or more, and that the subject has acted on these urges or suffers from distress as a result of having these feelings. The criteria also indicate that the subject should be 16 or older and that child or children they fantasize about are at least five years younger than them, though ongoing sexual relationships between a 12-13 year old and a late adolescent are advised to be excluded. A diagnosis is further specified by the sex of the children the person is attracted to, if the impulses or acts are limited to incest, and if the attraction is "exclusive" or "nonexclusive".[1]

Many terms have been used to distinguish "true pedophiles" from non-pedophilic and non-exclusive offenders, or to distinguish among types of offenders on a continuum according to strength and exclusivity of pedophilic interest, and motivation for the offense (see child sexual offender types). Exclusive pedophiles are sometimes referred to as "true pedophiles." They are attracted to children, and children only. They show little erotic interest in adults their own age and in some cases, can only become aroused while fantasizing or being in the presence of prepubescent children. Non-exclusive pedophiles may at times be referred to as non-pedophilic offenders, but the two terms are not always synonymous. Non-exclusive pedophiles are attracted to both children and adults, and can be sexually aroused by both, though a sexual preference for one over the other in this case may also exist.[10]

Neither the ICD nor the DSM diagnostic criteria require actual sexual activity with a prepubescent youth. The diagnosis can therefore be made based on the presence of fantasies or sexual urges even if they have never been acted upon. On the other hand, a person who acts upon these urges yet experiences no distress about their fantasies or urges can also qualify for the diagnosis. Acting on sexual urges is not limited to overt sex acts for purposes of this diagnosis, and can sometimes include indecent exposure, voyeuristic or frotteuristic behaviors,[1] or masturbating to child pornography.[41] Often, these behaviors need to be considered in-context with an element of clinical judgment before a diagnosis is made. Likewise, when the patient is in late adolescence, the age difference is not specified in hard numbers and instead requires careful consideration of the situation.[42]

Ego-dystonic sexual orientation (F66.1) includes people who do not doubt that they have a prepubertal sexual preference, but wish it were different because of associated psychological and behavioral disorders. The World Health Organization (WHO) allows for the patient to seek treatment to change their sexual orientation.

Debate regarding the DSM criteriaEdit

The DSM IV criteria have been criticized simultaneously for being over-inclusive, as well as under-inclusive.[43] Though most researchers distinguish between child molesters and pedophiles,[3][25][26][43] Studer and Aylwin argue that the DSM criteria are over-inclusive because all acts of child molestation warrant the diagnosis. A child molester satisfies criteria A because of the behavior involving sexual activity with prepubescent children and criteria B because the individual has acted on those urges.[43] Furthermore, they argue that it also is under-inclusive in the case of individuals who do not act upon it and are not distressed by it.[43] The latter point has also been made by several other researchers who have remarked that a so-called "contented pedophile"—an individual who fantasizes about having sex with a child and masturbates to these fantasies, but does not commit child sexual abuse, and who does not feel subjectively distressed afterward—does not meet the DSM-IV-TR criteria for pedophilia, because this person does not meet Criterion B.[3][43][44][45][46] A large-scale survey about usage of different classification systems showed that the DSM classification is only rarely used. As an explanation, it was suggested that the under-inclusiveness, as well as a lack of validity, reliability and clarity might have led to the rejection of the DSM classification.[47]

Ray Blanchard, in his literature review for the DSM-5, noted the objections and proposed a general solution applicable to all paraphilias, namely a distinction between paraphilia and paraphilic disorder. The latter term is proposed to identify the diagnosable condition, which meets both Criterion A and B, whereas an individual who does not meet Criterion B, can be ascertained, but not diagnosed, as having a paraphilia.[48] The current proposals for the DSM V will also resolve the current overlap between pedophilia and hebephilia by combining both diagnosis in a single new diagnosis called Pedohebephilic Disorder.[38] This new diagnosis would be equivalent to the ICD-10 definition of pedophilia that already includes early pubescents.[3]

O'Donohue, however, took the issue in a different direction, suggesting instead that the diagnostic criteria be simplified to the attraction to children alone if ascertained by self-report, laboratory findings, or past behavior. He states that any sexual attraction to children is pathological and that distress is irrelevant, noting "this sexual attraction has the potential to cause significant harm to others and is also not in the best interests of the individual."[49]

In 1997, Howard E. Barbaree and Michael C. Seto, disagreed with the American Psychiatric Association's approach, and instead recommended the use of actions as the sole criterion for the diagnosis of pedophilia, as a means of taxonomic simplification.[50]

Other usesEdit

In a 1993 review of research on child sexual abuse, Sharon Araji and David Finkelhor stated that because this field of research was underdeveloped at that time, there are "definitional problems" resulting from lack of standardization among researchers in their use of the term "pedophilia". They described two definitions, a "restrictive" form referring to individuals with strong and exclusive sexual interest in children, and an "inclusive" definition, expanding the term to include offenders who engaged in sexual contact with a child, including incest. They stated that they used the wider definition in their review paper because behavioral criteria are easier to identify and do not require complex analysis of an individual's motivations.[23]

Biological associationsEdit

Although what causes pedophilia is not yet known, beginning in 2002, researchers began reporting a series of findings linking pedophilia with brain structure and function: Pedophilic (and hebephilic) men have lower IQs,[51][52][53] poorer scores on memory tests,[52] greater rates of non-right-handedness,[51][52][54][55] greater rates of school grade failure over and above the IQ differences,[56] lesser physical height,[57] greater probability of having suffered childhood head injuries resulting in unconsciousness,[58][59] and several differences in MRI-detected brain structures.[60][61][62] They report that their findings suggest that there are one or more neurological characteristics present at birth that cause or increase the likelihood of being pedophilic. Evidence of familial transmittability "suggests, but does not prove that genetic factors are responsible" for the development of pedophilia.[63]

Another study, using structural MRI, shows that male pedophiles have a lower volume of white matter than a control group.[60]

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has shown that child molesters diagnosed with pedophilia have reduced activation of the hypothalamus as compared with non-pedophilic persons when viewing sexually arousing pictures of adults.[64] A 2008 functional neuroimaging study notes that central processing of sexual stimuli in heterosexual "paedophile forensic inpatients" may be altered by a disturbance in the prefrontal networks, which "may be associated with stimulus-controlled behaviours, such as sexual compulsive behaviours." The findings may also suggest "a dysfunction at the cognitive stage of sexual arousal processing."[65]

Blanchard, Cantor, and Robichaud (2006) reviewed the research that attempted to identify hormonal aspects of pedophiles.[66] They concluded that there is some evidence that pedophilic men have less testosterone than controls, but that the research is of poor quality and that it is difficult to draw any firm conclusion from it.

Development and courseEdit

Pedophilia can be described as a disorder of sexual preference, phenomenologically similar to heterosexual or homosexual orientation because it emerges prior or during puberty, and because it is stable over time.[67] These observations, however, do not exclude pedophilia from the group of mental disorders because pedophilic acts cause harm, and pedophiles can sometimes be helped by mental health professionals to refrain from acting on their impulses.[68]

Prevalence and child molestationEdit

The prevalence of pedophilia in the general population is not known,[3][69] but is estimated to be lower than 5% based on several smaller studies with prevalance rates between 3% and 9%.[3][70] "Most sexual offenders against children are male, although female offenders may account for 0.4% to 4% of convicted sexual offenders. On the basis of a range of published reports, McConaghy estimates a 10 to 1 ratio of male-to-female child molesters." It is believed that the true number of female pedophiles is underrepresented by available estimates, and that reasons for this may include a "societal tendency to dismiss the negative impact of sexual relationships between young boys and adult women, as well as women’s greater access to very young children who cannot report their abuse," among other explanations.[10]

The term pedophile is commonly used to describe all child sexual abuse offenders, including those who do not meet the clinical diagnosis standards, which is seen as problematic by researchers,[21][25] as most distinguish between child molesters and pedophiles.[3][25][26][43] A perpetrator of child sexual abuse is commonly assumed to be and referred to as a pedophile; however, there may be other motivations for the crime[50] (such as stress, marital problems, or the unavailability of an adult partner).[71] Child sexual abuse may or may not be an indicator that its perpetrator is a pedophile. Offenders may be separated into two types: Exclusive (i.e., "true pedophiles") and non-exclusive (or, in some cases, "non-pedophilic"). According to a U.S. study on 2429 adult male pedophile sex offenders, only 7% identified themselves as exclusive; indicating that many or most offenders fall into the non-exclusive category.[24] However, the Mayo Clinic reports perpetrators who meet the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia offend more often than non-pedophile perpetrators, and with a greater number of victims. They state that approximately 95% of child sexual abuse incidents are committed by the 88% of child molestation offenders who meet the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia.[24] A behavioral analysis report by the FBI states that a "high percentage of acquaintance child molesters are preferential sex offenders who have a true sexual preference for [prepubescent] children (i.e., true pedophiles)."[22]

A review article in the British Journal of Psychiatry notes the overlap between extrafamilial and intrafamilial offenders. One study found that around half of the fathers and stepfathers in its sample who were referred for committing extrafamilial abuse had also been abusing their own children.[72]

As noted by Abel, Mittleman, and Becker[73] (1985) and Ward et al. (1995), there are generally large distinctions between the two types of offenders' characteristics. Situational offenders tend to offend at times of stress; have a later onset of offending; have fewer, often familial victims; and have a general preference for adult partners. Pedophilic offenders, however, often start offending at an early age; often have a large number of victims who are frequently extrafamilial; are more inwardly driven to offend; and have values or beliefs that strongly support an offense lifestyle. Research suggests that incest offenders recidivate at approximately half the rate of extrafamilial child molesters, and one study estimated that by the time of entry to treatment, nonincestuous pedophiles who molest boys had committed an average of 282 offenses against 150 victims.[74]

Some child molesters — pedophiles or not — threaten their victims to stop them from reporting their actions.[1] Others, like those that often victimize children, can develop complex ways of getting access to children, like gaining the trust of a child's parent, trading children with other pedophiles or, infrequently, get foster children from non-industrialized nations or abduct child victims from strangers.[1] Pedophiles may often act interested in the child, to gain the child's interest, loyalty and affection to keep the child from letting others know about the abuse.[1]

Psychopathology and personality traitsEdit

Several researchers have reported correlations between pedophilia and certain psychological characteristics, such as low self-esteem[75][76] and poor social skills.[77] Cohen et al. (2002), studying child sex offenders, states that pedophiles have impaired interpersonal functioning and elevated passive-aggressiveness, as well as impaired self-concept. Regarding disinhibitory traits, pedophiles demonstrate elevated sociopathy and propensity for cognitive distortions. According to the authors, pathologic personality traits in pedophiles lend support to a hypothesis that such pathology is related to both motivation for and failure to inhibit pedophilic behavior.[78]

According to Wilson and Cox (1983), "The paedophiles emerge as significantly higher on Psychoticism, Introversion and Neurotocism than age-matched controls. [But] there is a difficulty in untangling cause and effect. We cannot tell whether paedophiles gravitate towards children because, being highly introverted, they find the company of children less threatening than that of adults, or whether the social withdrawal implied by their introversion is a result of the isloation engendered by their preference i.e., awareness of the social approbation and hostility that it evokes" (p. 324).[79]

Studying child sex offenders, a review of qualitative research studies published between 1982 and 2001 concluded that pedophiles use cognitive distortions to meet personal needs, justifying abuse by making excuses, redefining their actions as love and mutuality, and exploiting the power imbalance inherent in all adult-child relationships.[80] Other cognitive distortions include the idea of "children as sexual beings," "uncontrollability of sexuality," and "sexual entitlement-bias."[81]

One review of the literature concludes that research on personality correlates and psychopathology in pedophiles is rarely methodologically correct, in part owing to confusion between pedophiles and child sex offenders, as well as the difficulty of obtaining a representative, community sample of pedophiles.[82] Seto (2004) points out that pedophiles who are available from a clinical setting are likely there because of distress over their sexual preference or pressure from others. This increases the likelihood that they will show psychological problems. Similarly, pedophiles recruited from a correctional setting have been convicted of a crime, making it more likely that they will show anti-social characteristics.[69]

While not causes of pedophilia themselves, comorbid psychiatric illnesses — such as personality disorders and substance abuse — are risk factors for acting on pedophilic urges.[11] Blanchard, Cantor, and Robichaud (2006) noted about comorbid psychiatric illnesses that, "The theoretical implications are not so clear. Do particular genes or noxious factors in the prenatal environment predispose a male to develop both affective disorders and pedophilia, or do the frustration, danger, and isolation engendered by unacceptable sexual desires — or their occasional furtive satisfaction — lead to anxiety and despair?"[66] They indicated that, because they previously found mothers of pedophiles to be more likely to have undergone psychiatric treatment,[58] the genetic possibility is more likely.

TreatmentEdit

Although pedophilia has yet no cure, various treatments are available that are aimed at reducing or preventing the expression of pedophilic behavior, reducing the prevalence of child sexual abuse.[12][83] Treatment of pedophilia often requires collaboration between law enforcement and health care professionals.[11][12] A number of proposed treatment techniques for pedophilia have been developed, though the success rate of these therapies has been very low.[84]

Cognitive behavioral therapy ("relapse prevention")Edit

Cognitive behavioral therapy has been shown to reduce recidivism in contact sex offenders.[85]

According to Canadian sexologist Michael Seto, cognitive-behavioral treatments target attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors that are believed to increase the likelihood of sexual offenses against children, and "relapse prevention" is the most common type of cognitive behavioral treatment.[86] The techniques of relapse prevention are based on principles used for treating addictions.[87] Other scientists have also done some research that indicates that recidivism rates of pedophiles in therapy are lower than pedophiles who eschew therapy.[87]

Behavioral interventionsEdit

Behavioral treatments target sexual arousal to children, using satiation and aversion techniques to suppress sexual arousal to children and covert sensitization (or masturbatory reconditioning) to increase sexual arousal to adults.[86] Behavioral treatments appear to have an effect on sexual arousal patterns on phallometric testing, but it is not known whether the test changes represent changes in sexual interests or changes in the ability to control genital arousal during testing.[88][89]

Applied behavior analysis has been applied with sex offenders with mental disabilities.[90]

Pharmacological interventionsEdit

Medications are used to lower sex drive in pedophiles by interfering with the activity of testosterone, such as with Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate), Androcur (cyproterone acetate), and Lupron (leuprolide acetate).

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues, which last longer and have fewer side-effects, are also effective in reducing libido and may be used.[91]

These treatments, commonly referred to as "chemical castration", are often used in conjunction with the non-medical approaches noted above. According the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, "Anti-androgen treatment should be coupled with appropriate monitoring and counseling within a comprehensive treatment plan."[92]

Limitations of treatmentEdit

Although these results are relevant to the prevention of reoffending in contact child sex offenders, there is no empirical suggestion that such therapy is a cure for pedophilia. Dr. Fred Berlin, founder of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic, believes that pedophilia could be successfully treated if the medical community would give it more attention.[93] Castration, either physical or chemical, appears to be highly effective in removing such sexual impulses when offending is driven by the libido, but this method is not recommended when the drive is an expression of anger or the need for power and control (e.g., violent/sadistic offenders).[94] Chemical and surgical castration has been used in several European countries since World War II, although not to the extent it was employed in Nazi Germany. The program in Hamburg was terminated after 2000, while Poland is now seeking to introduce chemical castration.[95] The Council of Europe works to bring the practice to an end in Eastern European countries where it is still applied through the courts.[96]

In law and forensic psychologyEdit

In law enforcement circles, the term "pedophile" is sometimes used in a broad manner to encompass a person who commits one or more sexually-based crimes that relate to legally underage victims. These crimes may include child sexual abuse, statutory rape, offenses involving child pornography, child grooming, stalking, and indecent exposure. One unit of the United Kingdom's Child Abuse Investigation Command is known as the "Paedophile Unit" and specializes in online investigations and enforcement work.[97] Some forensic science texts, such as Holmes (2008) use the term to refer to a class of psychological offender typologies that target child victims, even when such children are not the primary sexual interest of the offender.[98] The FBI, however, makes a point of acknowledging preferential sex offenders who have a true sexual preference for prepubescent children.[22]

Civil commitment Edit

In the United States, following Kansas v. Hendricks, sex offenders that can be diagnosed with certain mental disorders, including pedophilia, can be subject to indefinite civil commitment.[13] In Kansas v. Hendricks, the US Supreme Court upheld as constitutional a Kansas law, the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA), under which Hendricks, a pedophile, was found to have a "mental abnormality" defined as a "congenital or acquired condition affecting the emotional or volitional capacity which predisposes the person to commit sexually violent offenses to the degree that such person is a menace to the health and safety of others," which allowed the State to confine Hendricks indefinitely irrespective of whether the State provided any treatment to Hendricks.[99][100][101] In United States v. Comstock, this type of indefinite confinement was upheld for someone previously convicted on child pornography charges; this time a federal law was involved—the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act.[17][102] The Wash Act does not require a conviction on a sex offense charge, but only that the person be a federal prisoner, and one who "has engaged or attempted to engage in sexually violent conduct or child molestation and who is sexually dangerous to others", and who "would have serious difficulty in refraining from sexually violent conduct or child molestation if released". Neither sexually violent conduct nor child molestation is defined by the Act.[103]

Child pornographyEdit

Child pornography is commonly collected by pedophiles who use the images for a variety of purposes, ranging from private sexual uses, trading with other pedophiles, preparing children for sexual abuse as part of the process known as "child grooming", or enticement leading to entrapment for sexual exploitation such as production of new child pornography or child prostitution.[104][105][106]

Pedophile viewers of child pornography are often obsessive about collecting, organizing, categorizing, and labeling their child pornography collection according to age, gender, sex act and fantasy.[107][108] According to FBI agent Ken Lanning, "collecting" pornography does not mean that they merely view pornography, but that they save it, and "it comes to define, fuel, and validate their most cherished sexual fantasies." An extensive collection indicates a strong sexual preference for children and the owned collection is the single best indicator of what he or she wants to do.[108] Researchers Taylor and Quayle reported that pedophile collectors of child pornography are often involved in anonymous internet communities dedicated to extending their collections.[109] Pedophile online community bulletin boards often contain technical advice from experienced child pornography offenders assisting new users with protecting themselves from detection.[108]

Societal viewsEdit

Pedophilia and child sexual abuse are generally seen as morally wrong and abnormal by society.[110][111][112] Research at the close of the 1980s showed that there was a great deal of misunderstanding and unrealistic perceptions in the general public about pedophilia (La Fontaine, 1990; Leberg, 1997). However, a more recent study showed that the public's perception has gradually become more well-informed on the subject.[113]

Misuse of medical terminologyEdit

The words "pedophile" and "pedophilia" are sometimes used informally to describe an adult's sexual interest or attraction to pubescent or post-pubescent teenagers and to other situations that do not fit within the clinical definitions. The terms "hebephilia" or "ephebophilia" may be more accurate in these cases.[2][39] This was especially seen in the case of Mark Foley during the congressional page incident. Most of the media labeled Foley a pedophile, which led David Tuller of Slate magazine to state that Foley was not a pedophile but rather an ephebophile.[114]

Another erroneous but unfortunately common usage of "pedophilia" is to refer to the actus reus itself (that is, interchangeably with "sexual abuse")[2][18][19][20] rather than the medical meaning, which is a preference for that age group on the part of the older individual.[21][22] Even more problematic are situations where the terms are misused to refer to relationships where the younger person is an adult of legal age, but is either perceived socially as being too young in comparison to their older partner, or the older partner occupies a position of authority over them.[115][116] Researchers recommend that these imprecise uses be avoided.[21][39]

Pedophile advocacy groupsEdit

During the late 1950s to early 1990s, several pedophile membership organizations advocated age of consent reform to lower or abolish age of consent laws,[117][118][119] and for the acceptance of pedophilia as a sexual orientation rather than a psychological disorder,[120] and the legalization of child pornography.[119] The efforts of pedophile advocacy groups did not gain any public support[117][119][121][122][123] and today those few groups that have not dissolved have only minimal membership and have ceased their activities other than through a few websites.[119][123][124][125]

Anti-pedophile activismEdit

Anti-pedophile activism encompasses opposition against pedophiles, against pedophile advocacy groups, and against other phenomena that are seen as related to pedophilia, such as child pornography and child sexual abuse.[126] Much of the direct action classified as anti-pedophile involves demonstrations against sex offenders,[127] groups advocating legalization of sexual activity between adults and children,[128] and Internet users who solicit sex from minors.

High-profile media attention to pedophilia has led to incidents of moral panic , particularly following reports of associated pedophilia associated with satanic ritual abuse and day care sex abuse.[129] Instances of vigilantism have also been reported in response to public attention on convicted or suspected child sex offenders. In 2000, following a media campaign of "naming and shaming" suspected pedophiles in the UK, hundreds of residents took to the streets in protest against suspected pedophiles, eventually escalating to violent conduct requiring police intervention.[127]

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV TR (Text Revision). Arlington, VA, USA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.. 2000-06. p. 943. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349. ISBN 978-0890420249. http://www.psychiatryonline.com/resourceTOC.aspx?resourceID=1.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 "Pedophilia". Encyclopædia Britannica. http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9058932.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Seto MC.(2009) Pedophilia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 5:391-407.
  4. Section F65.4: Paedophilia (online access via ICD-10 site map table of contents."Pedophilia". ICD-10. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/GRNBOOK.pdf. Retrieved 2012-10-10.
  5. Liddell, H.G., and Scott, Robert (1959). Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon. ISBN 0-19-910206-6.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 World Health Organization, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: ICD-10 Section F65.4: Paedophilia (online access via ICD-10 site map table of contents)
  7. http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/RecentUpdates.asp
  8. Goldman, Howard H. (2000). Review of General Psychiatry. McGraw-Hill Professional Psychiatry. p. 374. ISBN 0838584349.
  9. Ryan C. W. Hall, MD and Richard C. W. Hall, MD, PA, Mayo Clinic Proceedings A Profile of Pedophilia'.' Retrieved September 29, 2009.
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Lisa J. Cohen, PhD and Igor Galynker, MD, PhD (2009-06-08). "Psychopathology and Personality Traits of Pedophiles". Psychiatric Times. http://archive.is/20121201153008/www.psychiatrictimes.com/display/article/10168/1420331. Retrieved 2010-10-15.
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 Fagan PJ, Wise TN, Schmidt CW, Berlin FS (November 2002). "Pedophilia". JAMA 288 (19): 2458–65. doi:10.1001/jama.288.19.2458. PMID 12435259. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=12435259.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Fuller AK (January 1989). "Child molestation and pedophilia. An overview for the physician". JAMA 261 (4): 602–6. doi:10.1001/jama.261.4.602. PMID 2642565.
  13. 13.0 13.1 http://www.courtpsychiatrist.com/pdf/pharmacological%20treatment%20sex%20offenders.pdf
  14. http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/30/4/556.pdf
  15. http://books.google.com/books?id=V-jrT7yjiwgC&pg=PA483
  16. http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/36/4/443.pdf
  17. 17.0 17.1 JESSE J. HOLLAND, Court: Sexually dangerous can be kept in prison, Associated Press. Retrieved 5-16-2010.
  18. 18.0 18.1 "Pedophilia". Psychology Today Diagnosis Dictionary. Sussex Publishers, LLC. 7 September 2006. http://psychologytoday.com/conditions/pedophilia.html. "Pedophilia is defined as the fantasy or act of sexual activity with prepubescent children."
  19. 19.0 19.1 Burgess, Ann Wolbert; Ann Wolbert (1978). Sexual Assault of Children and Adolescents. Lexington Books. pp. 9–10, 24, 40. ISBN 0669018929. "the sexual misuse and abuse of children constitutes pedophilia"
  20. 20.0 20.1 ""pedophilia" (n.d.)". The American Heritage Stedman's Medical Dictionary. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pedophilia. Retrieved 2010-09-23. "The act or fantasy on the part of an adult of engaging in sexual activity with a child or children."
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 Ames MA, Houston DA (August 1990). "Legal, social, and biological definitions of pedophilia". Arch Sex Behav 19 (4): 333–42. doi:10.1007/BF01541928. PMID 2205170.
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 22.3 22.4 Lanning, Kenneth (2001). "Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis (Third Edition)" (PDF). National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. pp. 25, 27, 29. http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/publications/NC70.pdf.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Finkelhor, David; Sharon Araji (1986). A Sourcebook on Child Sexual Abuse: Sourcebook on Child Sexual Abuse. Sage Publications. p. 90. ISBN 0803927495.
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 Hall, MD, Ryan C. W.; Richard C. W. Hall, MD, PA.. "A Profile of Pedophilia: Definition, Characteristics of Offenders, Recidivism, Treatment Outcomes, and Forensic Issues" (PDF). Mayo Clin Proc (MAYO Foundation for medical education and research) 82:457-471 2007. http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/pdf%2F8204%2F8204sa.pdf.
  25. 25.0 25.1 25.2 25.3 Edwards, M. (1997) "Treatment for Paedophiles; Treatment for Sex Offenders." Paedophile Policy and Prevention, Australian Institute of Criminology Research and Public Policy Series (12), 74-75.
  26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 Blaney, Paul H.; Millon, Theodore (2009). Oxford Textbook of Psychopathology (Oxford Series in Clinical Psychology) (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 528. ISBN 0-19-537421-5. "Some cases of child molestation, especially those involving incest, are committed in the absence of any identifiable deviant erotic age preference."
  27. Beier, K. M., Ahlers, C. J., Goecker, D., Neutze, J., Mundt, I. A., Hupp, E., & Schaefer, G. A. (2009). Can pedophiles be reached for primary prevention of child sexual abuse? First results of the Berlin Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD). The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 851–867.
  28. "Pedophilia (Causes)". Psychology Today. Sussex Publishers, LLC. 7 September 2006. http://www.psychologytoday.com/conditions/pedophilia?tab=Causes.
  29. Liddell, H.G., and Scott, Robert (1959). Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon. ISBN 0-19-910206-6.
  30. Laws, D. Richard; William T. O'Donohue (2008). Sexual Deviance: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment. Guilford Press. p. 176. ISBN 1593856059.
  31. Blanchard R, Lykins AD, Wherrett D, Kuban ME, Cantor JM, Blak T, Dickey R, Klassen PE. Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Jun;38(3):335-50. Epub 2008 Aug 7. PubMed PMID: 18686026.
  32. 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 Von Krafft-Ebing, Richard (1922). Psychopathia Sexualis. Translated to English by Francis Joseph Rebman. Medical Art Agency. pp. 552–560. ISBN 1871592550.
  33. Roudinesco, Élisabeth (2009). Our dark side: a history of perversion, p. 144. Polity, ISBN 9780745645933
  34. Forel, Auguste (1908). The Sexual Question: A scientific, psychological, hygienic and sociological study for the cultured classes. Translated to English by C.F. Marshall, MD. Rebman. pp. 254–255.
  35. American Psychiatric Association Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics (1952). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (1st ed.). Washington, D.C: The Association. p. 39.
  36. American Psychiatric Association: Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association. p. 271.
  37. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-III-R. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. 1987. ISBN 0-89042-018-1.
  38. 38.0 38.1 Pedohebephilic Disorder
  39. 39.0 39.1 39.2 S. Berlin, Frederick. "Interview with Frederick S. Berlin, M.D., Ph.D.". Office of Media Relations. http://www.usccb.org/comm/kit6.shtml. Retrieved 2008-06-27.
  40. Franklin, K. (2009). The public policy implications of 'Hebephilia': A response to Blanchard et al. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 319-320. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9425-y
  41. Seto MC, Cantor JM, Blanchard R (August 2006). "Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia". J Abnorm Psychol 115 (3): 610–5. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.115.3.610. PMID 16866601. "The results suggest child pornography offending is a stronger diagnostic indicator of pedophilia than is sexually offending against child victims".
  42. Pedophilia DSM at the Medem Online Medical Library
  43. 43.0 43.1 43.2 43.3 43.4 43.5 Lea H. Studer and A. Scott Aylwin (2006) Pedophilia: The problem with diagnosis and limitations of CBT in treatment. Medical Hypotheses 67: 774–781
  44. William O'Donohue, Lisa G. Regev and Anne Hagstrom (2000). "Problems with the DSM-IV Diagnosis of Pedophilia". Journal of Research and Treatment 12 (2): 95–105,. doi:10.1023/A:1009586023326. http://www.springerlink.com/content/x29808w856183157/.
  45. Green, R. (2002). Is pedophilia a mental disorder? Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 31, 2002.
  46. Heather M. Moulden; Philip Firestone; Drew Kingston; John Bradford (2009) Recidivism in pedophiles: an investigation using different diagnostic methods. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 20(5): 680 - 701
  47. Feelgood, Steven and Hoyer, Jürgen(2008) 'Child molester or paedophile? Sociolegal versus psychopathological classification of sexual offenders against children', Journal of Sexual Aggression, 14: 1, 33 — 43
  48. The DSM Diagnostic Criteria for Pedophilia
  49. O'Donohue, W. (Jun 2010). "A critique of the proposed DSM-V diagnosis of pedophilia.". Arch Sex Behav 39 (3): 587–90. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9604-5. PMID 20204487.
  50. 50.0 50.1 Barbaree, H. E., and Seto, M. C. (1997). Pedophilia: Assessment and Treatment. Sexual Deviance: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment. 175-193.
  51. 51.0 51.1 Blanchard, R., Kolla, N. J., Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2007). IQ, handedness, and pedophilia in adult male patients stratified by referral source. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 285-309.
  52. 52.0 52.1 52.2 Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Christensen, B. K., Dickey, R., Klassen, P. E., Beckstead, A. L., Blak, T., & Kuban, M. E. (2004). Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia. Neuropsychology, 18, 3–14.
  53. Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Robichaud, L. K., & Christensen, B. K. (2005). Quantitative reanalysis of aggregate data on IQ in sexual offenders. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 555–568.
  54. Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., Christensen, B. K., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Williams, N. S., & Blanchard, R. (2005). Handedness in pedophilia and hebephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 447–459.
  55. Bogaert, A. F. (2001). Handedness, criminality, and sexual offending. Neuropsychologia, 39, 465–469.
  56. Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., & Blanchard, R. (2006). Grade failure and special education placement in sexual offenders’ educational histories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 743–751.
  57. Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Physical height in pedophilia and hebephilia. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 395–407.
  58. 58.0 58.1 Blanchard, R., Christensen, B. K., Strong, S. M., Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., & Blak, T. (2002). Retrospective self-reports of childhood accidents causing unconsciousness in phallometrically diagnosed pedophiles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 511–526.
  59. Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Christensen, B. K., Cantor, J. M., & Blak, T. (2003). Self-reported injuries before and after age 13 in pedophilic and non-pedophilic men referred for clinical assessment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 573–581.
  60. 60.0 60.1 Cantor, J. M., Kabani, N., Christensen, B. K., Zipursky, R. B., Barbaree, H. E., Dickey, R., Klassen, P. E., Mikulis, D. J., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Richards, B. A., Hanratty, M. K., & Blanchard, R. (2008). Cerebral white matter deficiencies in pedophilic men. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 42, 167–183.
  61. Schiffer, B., Peschel, T., Paul, T., Gizewski, E., Forsting, M., Leygraf, N., Schedlowski, M., Krueger, T. H. C. (2007). Structural brain abnormalities in the frontostriatal system and cerebellum in pedophilia. 'Journal of Psychiatric Research, 41, 753–762
  62. Schiltz, K., Witzel, J., Northoff, G., Zierhut, K., Gubka, U., Fellman, H., Kaufmann, J., Tempelmann, C., Wiebking, C., & Bogerts, B. (2007). Brain pathology in pedophilic offenders: Evidence of volume reduction in the right amygdala and related diencephalic structures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 737–746.
  63. Gaffney GR, Lurie SF, Berlin FS (September 1984). "Is there familial transmission of pedophilia?". J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 172 (9): 546–8. doi:10.1097/00005053-198409000-00006. PMID 6470698.
  64. Walter et al. (2007). "Pedophilia Is Linked to Reduced Activation in Hypothalamus and Lateral Prefrontal Cortex During Visual Erotic Stimulation." Biological Psychiatry. 62.
  65. Schiffer B, Paul T, Gizewski E, et al. (May 2008). "Functional brain correlates of heterosexual paedophilia". Neuroimage 41 (1): 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.008. PMID 18358744.
  66. 66.0 66.1 Blanchard, R., Cantor, J. M., & Robichaud, L. K. (2006). Biological factors in the development of sexual deviance and aggression in males. In H. E. Barbaree & W. L. Marshall (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 77–104). New York: Guilford.
  67. Brian L. Cutler, Encyclopedia of Psychology and Law, SAGE, 2008, ISBN 9781412951890, p. 549
  68. http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/157/5/838
  69. 69.0 69.1 Seto MC (2004). "Pedophilia and sexual offenses against children". Annu Rev Sex Res 15: 321–61. PMID 16913283.
  70. Ahlers, C. J., Schaefer, G. A., Mundt, I. A., Roll, S., Englert, H., Willich, S. N. and Beier, K. M. , How Unusual are the Contents of Paraphilias? Paraphilia-Associated Sexual Arousal Patterns in a Community-Based Sample of Men. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01597.x
  71. Howells, K. (1981). "Adult sexual interest in children: Considerations relevant to theories of aetiology," Adult sexual interest in children. 55-94.
  72. M. GLASSER, FRCPsych and I. KOLVIN, FRCPsych (2001). "Cycle of child sexual abuse: links between being a victim and becoming a perpetrator". British Journal of Psychiatry. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/full/bjprcpsych;179/6/482.
  73. Abel, G. G., Mittleman, M. S., & Becker, J. V. (1985). "Sex offenders: Results of assessment and recommendations for treatment." In M. H. Ben-Aron, S. J. Hucker, & C. D. Webster (Eds.), Clinical criminology: The assessment and treatment of criminal behavior (pp. 207–220). Toronto, Canada: M & M Graphics.
  74. Linda S. Grossman, Ph.D., Brian Martis, M.D. and Christopher G. Fichtner, M.D. (1 March 1999). "Are Sex Offenders Treatable? A Research Overview". Psychiatric Services 50 (3): 349–361work=Psychiatr Serv. PMID 10096639. http://psychservices.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/50/3/349.
  75. Marshall, W. L. (1997). The relationship between self-esteem and deviant sexual arousal in nonfamilial child molesters. Behavior Modification, 21, 86–96.
  76. Marshall, W., L., Cripps, E., Anderson, D., & Cortoni, F. A. (1999). Self-esteem and coping strategies in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 955–962.
  77. Emmers-Sommer, T. M., Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Sahlstein, E., Laskowski, K., Falato, W. L., et al. (2004). A meta-analysis of the relationship between social skills and sexual offenders. Communication Reports, 17, 1–10.
  78. Cohen LJ, McGeoch PG, Watras-Gans S, et al. (October 2002). "Personality impairment in male pedophiles" (PDF). J Clin Psychiatry 63 (10): 912–9. PMID 12416601. http://www.psychiatrist.com/privatepdf/2002/v63n10/v63n1009.pdf.
  79. Wilson, G. D., & Cox, D. N. (1983). Personality of paeodphile club members. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 323-329.
  80. Lawson L. (2003 September–November;). "Isolation, gratification, justification: offenders' explanations of child molesting". Issues Ment Health Nurs (6-7): (24): 695–705. PMID 12907384 : 12907384.
  81. Mihailides S, Devilly GJ, Ward T. (October 2004). "Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending". Sex Abuse 16 ((4):): 333–50. doi:10.1177/107906320401600406. PMID 15560415 : 15560415.
  82. Okami, P. & Goldberg, A. (1992). "Personality Correlates of Pedophilia: Are They Reliable Indicators?", Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 297–328. "For example, because an unknown percentage of true pedophiles may never act on their impulses or may never be arrested, forensic samples of sex offenders against minors clearly do not represent the population of “pedophiles,” and many such persons apparently do not even belong to the population of “pedophiles.”"
  83. Public Policy
  84. Crawford, David (1981). "Treatment approaches with pedophiles." Adult sexual interest in children. 181-217.
  85. Marshall, W.L., Jones, R., Ward, T., Johnston, P. & Bambaree, H.E.(1991). Treatment of sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 465-485
  86. 86.0 86.1 Seto, M. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  87. 87.0 87.1 Pedophilia Often in Headlines, But Not in Research Labs — Psychiatric News
  88. Barbaree, H. E., Bogaert, A. F., & Seto, M. C. (1995). Sexual reorientation therapy for pedophiles: Practices and controversies. In L. Diamant & R. D. McAnulty (Eds.), The psychology of sexual orientation, behavior, and identity: A handbook (pp. 357–383). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  89. Barbaree, H. C., & Seto, M. C. (1997). Pedophilia: Assessment and treatment. In D. R. Laws & W. T. O'Donohue (eds.), Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 175–193). New York: Guildford Press.
  90. Maguth Nezu, C., Fiore, A. A. & Nezu, A. M (2006). Problem Solving Treatment for Intellectually Disabled Sex Offenders. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 2, 266-275.
  91. Cohen, L. J. & Galynker, I. I. (2002). Clinical features of pedophilia and implications for treatment. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 8, 276-289.
  92. "Ant-androgen therapy and surgical castration". Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. 1997. http://www.atsa.com/ppantiandro.html.
  93. Berlin, M.D., Ph.D., =Fred S. (December 2002). "Peer Commentaries on Green (2002) and Schmidt (2002) - Pedophilia: When Is a Difference a Disorder?" (PDF). Archives of Sexual Behavior 31 (6): 479–480. doi:10.1023/A:1020603214218. http://www.paraphilias.com/publications/pdfs/Peer%20Comment.pdf. Retrieved 2009-12-17.
  94. Rondeaux, Candace. "Can Castration Be a Solution for Sex Offenders?". The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/04/AR2006070400960_pf.html. Retrieved 2010-05-22.
  95. DW-world.de
  96. DW-world.de
  97. "Metropolitan Police Service - SCD - Child Abuse Investigation Command". http://www.met.police.uk/scd/specialist_units/child_abuse.htm. Retrieved 12 October 2010.
  98. Holmes, Ronald M.. Profiling Violent Crimes: An Investigative Tool. Sage Pubns. ISBN 1-4129-5998-5.
  99. "Psychological Evaluation for the Courts, Second Edition - A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers - 9.04 Special Sentencing Provisions (b) Sexual Offender Statutes". Guilford.com. http://www.guilford.com/cgi-bin/cartscript.cgi?page=etc/courts_updates.html&cart_id=#part_two. Retrieved 2007-10-19.
  100. http://books.google.com/books?id=6MQj-mjHgBIC&pg=PA248
  101. http://books.google.com/books?id=gngG9zPmNKMC&pg=PA159
  102. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/us/politics/18offenders.html
  103. Barker, The Adam Walsh Act: Un-civil Commitment, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496934#
  104. Crosson-Tower, Cynthia (2005). Understanding child abuse and neglect. Allyn & Bacon. p. 208. ISBN 020540183X.
  105. Richard Wortley, Stephen Smallbone. "Child Pornography on the Internet". Problem-Oriented Guides for Police No. 41: p14–16.
  106. Levesque, Roger J. R. (1999). Sexual Abuse of Children: A Human Rights Perspective. Indiana University. pp. p64. ISBN 0253334713.
  107. Crosson-Tower, Cynthia (2005). Understanding child abuse and neglect. Allyn & Bacon. pp. 198–200. ISBN 020540183X.
  108. 108.0 108.1 108.2 Lanning, Kenneth V. (2001). Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis 4th ed.. 86. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
  109. "Child pornography: images of the abuse of children". National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. 2003. http://www.nspcc.org.uk/Inform/research/Briefings/imagesofchildabuse_wda48219.html.
  110. "Pedophilia is one sexual disorder that is widely looked upon as legally, socially, and morally wrong." Eric W. Hickey (2006). Sex crimes and paraphilia. Pearson Education (Digitized Oct 30, 2008). pp. 537 pages. ISBN 0131703501, 9780131703506. http://books.google.com/?id=xBUEAQAAIAAJ&q=Pedophilia+morally+wrong&dq=Pedophilia+morally+wrong. Retrieved 2010-10-15.
  111. Christian Smith (2010). What Is a Person?: Rethinking Humanity, Social Life, and the Moral Good from the Person Up. University of Chicago Press. pp. 544 pages. ISBN 0226765911, 9780226765914. http://books.google.com/?id=sT9r_h8X8I4C&pg=PA419&dq=Pedophilia+morally+wrong#v=onepage&q=Pedophilia%20morally%20wrong&f=false. Retrieved 2010-10-15.
  112. Ben Spieckera; Jan Steutela (September 1997). "Paedophilia, Sexual Desire and Perversity". Journal of Moral Education 26 (3): 331–342. doi:10.1080/0305724970260307. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a746543224.
  113. McCartan, K. (Oct 2004). "'Here There Be Monsters': the public's perception of paedophiles with particular reference to Belfast and Leicester.". Med Sci Law 44 (4): 327–42. doi:10.1258/rsmmsl.44.4.327. PMID 15573972.
  114. Tuller, David (2006-10-04). "What To Call Foley. The congressman isn't a pedophile. He's an ephebophile.". Slate. http://www.slate.com/id/2151018/. Retrieved 2010-10-17.
  115. "Andy Martin, GOP Senate Candidate, Calls Opponent Mark Kirk A "De Facto Pedophile"". http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/06/andy-martin-gop-senate-ca_n_413624.html. Retrieved 15 January 2010.
  116. Seligman, M. (1993). What you can change and what you can't, page 235. New York: Fawcett Columbine.
  117. 117.0 117.1 Jenkins, Philip (2006). Decade of Nightmares: The End of the Sixties and the Making of Eighties America. Oxford University Press. p. 120. ISBN 0-19-517866-1.
  118. Spiegel, Josef (2003). Sexual Abuse of Males: The Sam Model of Theory and Practice. Routledge. pp. 5, p9. ISBN 1-56032-403-1.
  119. 119.0 119.1 119.2 119.3 Eichewald, Kurt (August 21, 2006). "From Their Own Online World, Pedophiles Extend Their Reach". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/21/technology/21pedo.html.
  120. Dr. Frits Bernard,. "The Dutch Paedophile Emancipation Movement". Paidika: the Journal of Paedophilia 1 (2, (Autumn 1987), p. 35-4). "Heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality and paedophilia should be considered equally valuable forms of human behavior.".
  121. Jenkins, Philip (1992). Intimate Enemies: Moral Panics in Contemporary Great Britain. Aldine Transaction. p. 75. ISBN 0202304361. "In the 1970s, the pedophile movement was one of several fringe groups whose cause was to some extent espoused in the name of gay liberation."
  122. Stanton, Domna C. (1992). Discourses of Sexuality: From Aristotle to AIDS. University of Michigan Press. p. 405. ISBN 0-472-06513-0.
  123. 123.0 123.1 Hagan, Domna C.; Marvin B. Sussman (1988). Deviance and the family. Haworth Press. p. 131. ISBN 0-86656-726-7.
  124. Benoit Denizet-Lewis (2001). "Boy Crazy," Boston Magazine.
  125. Trembaly, Pierre. (2002) "Social interactions among paedophiles."
  126. Global Crime Report | Investigation | Child porn and the cybercrime treaty part 2 |BBC World Service
  127. 127.0 127.1 Families flee paedophile protests August 9, 2000. Retrieved January 24, 2008.
  128. Dutch paedophiles set up political party, May 30, 2006. Retrieved Jan2008.
  129. Jewkes Y (2004). Media and crime. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage. pp. 76–77. ISBN 0-7619-4765-5.

External linksEdit

ar:غلمانية

bs:Pedofilija br:Pedofiliezh bg:Педофилия ca:Pedofília cs:Pedofilie cy:Pedoffilia da:Pædofili de:Pädophilie et:Pedofiilia es:Pedofilia eo:Pedofilio fa:پدوفیلی fr:Pédophilie gl:Pedofilia gu:પીડોફિલિયા (બાળ યૌનશોષણ) ko:소아성애 hr:Pedofilija id:Pedofilia it:Pedofilia he:פדופיליה kn:ಪೀಡೊಫಿಲಿಯಾ (ಶಿಶುಕಾಮ) ka:პედოფილია lt:Pedofilija hu:Pedofília mk:Педофилија ms:Pedofilia nl:Pedofilie ja:ペドフィリア no:Pedofili nn:Pedofili pl:Pedofilia pt:Pedofilia ro:Pedofilie ru:Педофилия simple:Pedophile sk:Pedofília sr:Педофилија sh:Pedofilija fi:Pedofilia sv:Pedofili te:పెడోఫిలియా tr:Pedofili uk:Педофілія vi:Ái nhi yi:פעדעפיליע zh:恋童

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.