FANDOM


This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).

Child pornography laws in Canada forbid the production, distribution, and possession of child pornography.

Visual representationsEdit

Prohibition covers the visual representations of sexual activity by persons (real or imaginary) under the age of 18 years and the depiction of their sexual organ/anal region for a sexual purpose, unless an artistic, educational, scientific, or medical justification can be provided and the court accepts it.

Written depictionsEdit

It also includes the written depictions of persons or characters (fictional or non-fictional) under the age of 18 engaging in sexual activity.[1] Courts in Canada can also issue orders for the deletion of material from the internet from any computer system within the court's jurisdiction[2]

The current law criminalizes possession of purely fictional material and has been applied in the absence of any images of real children, including to possession of fictional stories with no pictures at all, or vice versa, cartoon pictures without any stories.[3]

Dynamic aspects of the InternetEdit

Law that addresses dynamic aspects of the Internet by regulating the nature of live-time chatting and email communications that may relate to enticing children for pornographic (e.g., web cam) or other sexual purposes has passed in 2002.[4] It also criminalizes the intentional access of child pornography.[5]

Canadian Criminal CodeEdit

Canadian laws addressing this are included in the C-46 amended Canadian Criminal Code passed in 1985. It is described under Part V: Sexual Offences, Public Morals and Disordery Conduct: Offences Tending to Corrupt Morals. Section 163.1 defines child pornography to include "a visual representation, whether or not it was made by electronic or mechanical means", that "shows a person who is or is depicted as being under the age of eighteen years and is engaged in or is depicted as engaged in explicit sexual activity", or "the dominant characteristic of which is the depiction, for a sexual purpose, of a sexual organ or the anal region of a person under the age of eighteen years."

Minimum penaltyEdit

The current minimum penalty for possession of, or "accessing," child pornography is fourteen days imprisonment.[6] 2111

CasesEdit

Eli LangerEdit

One early application of this law was the Eli Langer case. In 1993, this Toronto artist had an exhibition at the Mercer Gallery. His drawings included images of children in sexual positions. Police raided the gallery and confiscated the works. Langer was eventually acquitted after a trial because his work was considered artistic enough to be justified as protected speech.[7]

R. v. SharpeEdit

The whole law against simple possession of child pornography was declared void for two years in British Columbia following a 1998 ruling (R v Sharpe) by the Supreme Court of British Columbia but this decision was subsequently overturned by the Canadian Supreme Court.[8] Moreover, the definitive 2001 Supreme Court ruling on the case interprets the child pornography statute to include purely fictional material even when no real children were involved in its production. Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote,

Interpreting "person" in accordance with Parliament's purpose of criminalizing possession of material that poses a reasoned risk of harm to children, it seems that it should include visual works of the imagination as well as depictions of actual people. Notwithstanding the fact that 'person' in the charging section and in s. 163.1(1)(b) refers to a flesh-and-blood person, I conclude that "person" in s. 163.1(1)(a) includes both actual and imaginary human beings.

Edmonton, AlbertaEdit

In October 2005, Canadian police arrested a 26 year old Edmonton, Alberta man named Gordon Chin[10] for importing Japanese magazines[11] (manga) depicting explicit child sexuality.[12] Chin's attorney Darcy Depoe claimed Chin did not know it was illegal, and that he was naive. Despite this, Chin was sentenced by Judge David Tilley to an eighteen-month conditional sentence, during which he was barred from using the Internet. He was also required to perform 100 hours of community service and receive counseling, as well as to provide his DNA for the national sex offenders list. This is the first known manga-related child pornography case in Canada. It is also the first known that exclusively prosecutes this offense, not used in conjunction with other laws to increase sentencing.[13][14]

Yarmouth, Nova ScotiaEdit

In April 2006, a 21 year old American man from Long Island, New York named Dominic Sousa was sentenced to 30 days in jail for bringing child pornography to Yarmouth, Canada. While he had possession of three videos and three still images of real children, border services agency criminal investigator Blair MacDonald cited the 13,000 cartoon images in his possession and that being anime did not lessen the "prohibitive nature of these goods". He stated that "Canada doesn't tolerate the importation of such images".[15]

ReferencesEdit

  1. Criminal Code of Canada, section 163ff, accessed 2008-01-10
  2. Government of Canada. "BILL C-15A: AN ACT TO AMEND THE CRIMINAL CODE AND TO AMEND OTHER ACTS". http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/LS/371/371c15a-e.htm#4.%A0%20Court-Ordered. Retrieved 2008-05-09.
  3. R. v. Beattie (8 April 2005). Retrieved March 12, 2007.
  4. "STRONGER CHILD PORNOGRAPHY LAWS RECEIVE ROYAL ASSENT". Government of Canada. 2002-06-10. http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/news/nr/2002/doc_30529.html. Retrieved 2008-02-04.
  5. "BILL C-15A: AN ACT TO AMEND THE CRIMINAL CODE AND TO AMEND OTHER ACTS". The Parliament of Canada. 2002-09-30. http://www.parl.gc.ca/common/Bills_ls.asp?Parl=37&Ses=1&ls=C15A. Retrieved 2008-02-04.
  6. "CanLII - Fédéral - R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 - Section 163.1". Canlii.org. http://www.canlii.org/ca/sta/c-46/sec163.1.html. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  7. Tyler, Tracey (October 1994). "Artist backs right to paint sexual work". Globe and Mail.
  8. R v Sharpe, [1] (Supreme Court of British Columbia January 13, 1999). “As s-s.(4) is in violation of s.2(b) of the Charter and is not justified under s.1, s-s.(4) must be and is declared void.”
  9. R. v. Sharpe (26 January 2001). Retrieved February 20, 2006.
  10. Dear Edmonton Journal by Chris Macdonald of AnimeNewsNetwork
  11. Conviction for child toon porn - May be a first for Canadian courts by Tony Blais, Court Bureau, Edmonton Sun
  12. Canadian Arrested for Importing Loli-porn Manga (March 4, 2005, Anime News Network). Retrieved June 23, 2008.
  13. Canadian Sentenced over Loli-Porn Manga (October 20, 2005, Anime News Network). Retrieved January 20, 2006.
  14. Canadian Convicted of Possessing Hentai Kiddie Porn by Darklady of YNOT
  15. Jail time for man with cartoon child porn (April 4, 2006, CBC News)

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.